Saturday, June 7, 2014
Rule Number Eight
Friends and neighbors, put "i" before "e" except after "c," unless the word is either foreign or weird--per Keith and Marcie Lieber.
Monday, September 3, 2012
Go Ahead
I work in a casino. We constantly deal with money, of course. On larger sums, we need to seek approval from our supervisors. One of their common responses is, "Go ahead."
Now those two words, "go ahead," I have found to be fascinating in everyday speech. I first noticed their import when I was telemarketing and I'd hear one of the managers advise a customer on the phone, "Why don't you go ahead and send the payment so we can expedite your shipment." Doesn't that sound a bit softer or kinder than, "Why don't you send the payment . . . ." It seems that whenever there is a bit of negativity or burden involved with a process, "go ahead" creates a somewhat positive feeling and softens the blow. "Go ahead and tell the passengers that we're running into turbulent weather" probably sounds better to the airline staff than "Tell the passengers that we're running into turbulent weather."
Now, test for yourself. Note how many times in, say, a week you hear "go ahead." Oops--I mean, go ahead and note . . . .
Now those two words, "go ahead," I have found to be fascinating in everyday speech. I first noticed their import when I was telemarketing and I'd hear one of the managers advise a customer on the phone, "Why don't you go ahead and send the payment so we can expedite your shipment." Doesn't that sound a bit softer or kinder than, "Why don't you send the payment . . . ." It seems that whenever there is a bit of negativity or burden involved with a process, "go ahead" creates a somewhat positive feeling and softens the blow. "Go ahead and tell the passengers that we're running into turbulent weather" probably sounds better to the airline staff than "Tell the passengers that we're running into turbulent weather."
Now, test for yourself. Note how many times in, say, a week you hear "go ahead." Oops--I mean, go ahead and note . . . .
Labels:
command,
communication,
go ahead,
grammar,
language,
soften speech
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Nor: More or Less
I've discussed the misuses of the word "nor." I stress that the only correct use of "nor" is with "neither." Well, guess what? I'm not sure even that use is ideal. Why? Well, "neither" means "not either." Let's substitute. Take the sentence, "He is neither my brother nor my cousin." Change it to, "He is not either my brother nor my cousin." Oops--we've created a double (or 1 1/2) negative with both "not" and "nor." How about, "He is not either my brother or my cousin." Better. Then why don't we say, "He is neither my brother or my cousin"? Long-time custom, I guess. I'd just as soon get rid of "nor" altogether. Who's with me?
Labels:
communication,
double negatives,
grammar,
neither,
nor
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Another Redundancy
Recently I was observing a NASCAR public service announcement for disaster support. At the end, one driver urged everyone to "unite together." I guess that admonition sounds better than "unite separately."
Labels:
disaster,
good cause,
grammar,
NASCAR,
redundancy,
unite
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Grammatical Trans Fat
Now we're "transitioning" from one thing to another. I suppose the idea is to economize from the phrase, "make a transition," to the word, "transition." Well, "transition" should not be used as a verb. What, I'm making life more difficult for you? Not! Indeed, use "transit" instead. "I transited away from using nouns as verbs." Once again I kept it even simpler!
Labels:
communication,
grammar,
language,
talking,
transition,
writing
Shorter Cut
Let's get it straight right from the start, I'm not a texter. I have noticed, though, the abbreviation "lol." I keep thinking it means "lots of love." I am repeatedly told that it stands for "laughing out loud." Ok, then I have an abbreviation for the above abbreviation. You see, one shouldn't say "out loud." "Aloud" is preferred. Hence we have "laughing aloud" with an abbreviation of "la." Now isn't that nice?!
Labels:
communication,
grammar,
language,
talking,
writing
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Dangerously Bad Grammar
I've touched on some quick tips like these: If you can use "farther," don't use "further"; if you can use "whether," don't use "if"; and if you can use "and," don't use "or." An excellent example of the last of these can be seen on some gas pumps: "Turn off cell phones or other electrical devices to avoid possible explosion." A logical, though not common-sense, response might be, "I think I'll choose to turn off my laptop." Clearly the instruction is to turn off all electrical devices and should read, "Turn off cell phones and other electrical devices."
Labels:
communication,
grammar,
language,
talking,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
